Re: [tlug] and, back to gpg

[Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>]

On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 01:13:00PM -0500, Stuart Luppescu wrote:
> On ??, 2004-08-15 at 09:56 +0200, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 23:37:43 -0400, Scott Robbins <scottro@example.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, hope this is useful to someone--I can now sign emails to my users
> > > though none of them would even notice or doubt an unsigned email.
> > 
> > They'll probably think that the digital signature is some kind of virus :o)
> 
> Not a joke. Whenever I send signed messages to the AERA (American
> Educational Research Association) mailing list, I get a message back
> saying messages with attachment type application/pgp-signature are
> forbidden by the list. Some day I'll remember to not sign anything I
> post to that list....

Right, and that's why I have begun using the inline sig option when
posting to anything on a yahoogroups list and the like.   :)




-- 

Scott 

PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Spike: I did a couple of slayers in my time. I don't like to 
brag. Who am I kidding? I love to brag. One time, during the 
Boxer Rebellion...

Attachment: pgp00016.pgp
Description: PGP signature