Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] ulimit
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:37:41 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] ulimit
- References: <40D79386.7030008@example.com><87oencgj84.fsf@example.com><40D7F452.7020104@example.com>
- Organization: The XEmacs Project
- User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, linux)
>>>>> "simon" == simon colston <simon@example.com> writes: simon> Therefore, is this limit the max open files for all simon> processes started from this shell? The answer to the question I think you're asking is "yes". More precisely, it is the upper bound for the process group under the login process, which execs a shell AFAICS. fork(2) will inherit the current resource limits AFAICT from the man page. So /etc/security/limits.conf will affect all children of the login shell, but any ulimit's done in the login shell will propagate to its children, any ulimits they do will propagate to theirs, etc. Of course if any of those children suid root then all limits are off. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- References:
- [tlug] ulimit
- From: simon colston
- Re: [tlug] ulimit
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] ulimit
- From: simon colston
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] "presentation software" for Mozilla
- Next by Date: RE: [tlug] Job opportunity
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] ulimit
- Next by thread: [tlug] "presentation software" for Mozilla
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links