
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] Auto-detect (Was Option City)
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:02:12 +0900
- From: "Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon" <ronfaxon@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] Auto-detect (Was Option City)
- Organization: Images Through Glass
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316
>I have found that most cameras format their flash memory using the FAT file
>system, so I stick a line like this in my /etc/fstab:
>
>/dev/sda1 /mnt/camera vfat noauto,rw,user 0 0
>
>And make sure I have compiled the following kernel modules:
>
>vfat
>fat
>usb-storage
>sd_mod
>scsi_mod
>uhci
>usbcore
>
>Then, I can just attach my camera via USB, turn it on and issue:
>
>mount /mnt/camera
>
>And I can now deal with the JPGs on the flash memory just like any other
>files on any other file system.
>
>And verily, this is the Unix Way.
>
>
>
This brings up an interesting question for me - how radically different
are the different distros? With SuSE, right from the start (immediately
following the install I mean), it auto-detects USB devices and - as you
put it "...deal[s] with the JPGs on the flash memory just like any other
files on any other file system." I take it from your tips (thank you,
I'll file that and it may come in useful at some point), that your
distro didn't auto-detect and didn't deal with .jpg files without the
changes. I realize that over-automation is one of the more dangerous
aspects to the buggy software from a certain illegal mainstream software
company, but how about with SuSE - does the extra automation offered
"out of the box" cause security issues?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index