
Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] Unicode
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 12:32:01 +0900 (JST)
- From: "J. David Beutel" <jdb@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Unicode
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, simon colston wrote:
> But there may be benefits in having separate code points that don't
> overlap. If you type 'vent' into a search engine you are not searching
For that, you could use the separate, old character sets, instead of
Unicode.
> for "four characters that look like 'vent'", you are searching for "text
> that contains the word that has the meaning 'vent'". Any results that
> have a different meaning are useless for that search. The search engine
> could use any available markup information, I suppose, but markup should
> not really be used to give meaning to a document, rather just information
> on how the document should be displayed.
On the contrary, the markup should provide only meaning. The display
should be the user's choice.
Doing a web search in a particular language should be solved above the
level of character encodings.
11011011
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index