Re: [tlug] format for docs

[Viktor Pavlenko <vvp@example.com>]

>>>>> "BB" == Botond Botyanszki <botond@example.com> writes:

    BB> On Mon, 12 May 2003 09:02:00 +0200
    BB> Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com> wrote:
    >> 
    >> It's not exactly a "new exciting technology" but there's always
    >> HTML/XML which can easily be converted to PostScript, and from
    >> that into just about anything else. It also has the advantage
    >> of being platform-independent.

    BB> Docbook comes very close to what you have described here
    BB> (there is an XML version).  I have no experience with texinfo,
    BB> but using docbook is pretty easy. I would recommend that,
    BB> quite a few opensource projects are using it now.

Thanks for the replies. Meanwhile I've had a look at texinfo. Since
(1) I'm an emacs user, (2) makeinfo can be used to generate TeX, XML,
HTML and Docbook, and (3) I used to work for an SGML company I think
I'll give it (texinfo) a try.

-- 
Viktor