Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:31:58 +0900
- From: "A. Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- References: <AqkbIB.A.cx.kBmQ-@example.com> <200302071020.36163.patrick.niessen@example.com> <20030207015312.GE20288@example.com> <20030207021658.GE3844@example.com> <3E431956.15787238@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:26:30AM +0900, Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon wrote: > > I have tens of thousands of files, so that would make ReiserFS the best best bet > then? Yes it would. ReiserFS is quite efficient with lots of files because of its btree indexing until you near about a million files per directory and that is more than most large systems have anyway. How big are the files? -- A. Sajjad Zaidi http://www.filesystem.org/ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 267E0D0E
Attachment:
pgp00030.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- From: Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon
- Re: [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Suse 8.1 In-Hand
- From: Patrick Niessen
- Re: [tlug] Suse 8.1 In-Hand
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Suse 8.1 In-Hand
- From: A. Sajjad Zaidi
- [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- From: Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon
- Re: [tlug] Suse 8.1 In-Hand
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Suse 8.1 In-Hand
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Suse 8.1 In-Hand
- Previous by thread: [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] ReiserFS/XFS
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |