Re: [tlug] More on GPG signing

[Godwin Stewart <gstewart@example.com>]

On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:07:02 -0400, Josh Glover <jmglov@example.com> squashed
this out of the keyboard:

> One MTA is doing PGP/MIME correctly and the other is not.

If that were the case, would the e-mail be recognised as signed at all?

The fact that I can verify other people's keys no problem leads one to
believe that the e-mail is badly signed. And yet, if this is so, how come
someone else using the same version of the same MUA *can* verify the key?

FWIW, I'm using GnuPG 1.0.7 and GPGME 0.3.8 on Slackware 8.1.

-- 
G. Stewart   --   gstewart@example.com
                  gstewart@example.com
Registered Linux user #284683

GnuPG key  : BA3D01C6 (pgp.mit.edu)
Fingerprint: C3DF C686 6572 6E59 E3E4  0F40 2B9A 2218 BA3D 01C6
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sign spotted on a repair shop door:
WE CAN REPAIR ANYTHING.
(PLEASE KNOCK HARD ON THE DOOR - THE BELL DOESN'T WORK)

Attachment: pgp00072.pgp
Description: PGP signature