Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 23:22:53 +0900
- From: Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- References: <20020903012221.GD28108@example.com> <E17mCoD-0003UN-00@example.com> <20020903155806.3280bce1.gstewart@example.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 03 September 2002 22:58, Godwin Stewart wrote: > 1) The "Dark Side of the Source" relies on malleable sheep to accept their > crappy kludges around problems they can't and/or don't want to work out > properly. I personally don't see why I should cripple my tools just because > a software company (which I already regard not very highly) can't get its > act together. You know, Linux advocacy is a funny thing. Too few years ago, web designers all over the planet were flooded with demands to keep websites downward compatible to Lynx. Now, but when it comes to something much more important like security, all of a sudden everybody refuses to include those with the lesser tools... If it was OE we're talking about here, I'd shut up immediately. Alas, I've been using KMail 1.3.2 in Mandrake 8.2 all evening, and neither is a Redmond product... > 2) The client you linked to doesn't do both ascii-armoured and pgp/mime, it > only does pgp/mime: "You can use GPGMail for plain text and MIME messages, > following RFC 3156". Note where the comma is - it implies that both plain > text and MIMEified messages can be signed in an RFC3156-compliant manner, > therefore via PGP/MIME. Nope, that's not what I meant. Further down, past some of the pix: "GPGMail can use two different formats for encryption/signature: if your message consists of plain text (no attachments, no rich text attributes like bold, italic, etc.), GPGMail will use the old PGP format, with inline -----PGP----- armored signature/encryption. In the other case, it will use the new OpenPGP/MIME format, with MIME attachments, which is not recognized by some mail agents like Outlook/Entourage/Eudora, but welcomed by Sylpheed, Mulberry and others. If you prefer GPGMail to always use the OpenPGP/MIME format, then quit Mail, launch Terminal, type defaults write.com.apple.mail GPGOpenPGPStyleOnly YES and restart Mail." Something like this would be nice, no? Cheers Ulrich Plate <-- trying to get the &#%$'&% GPGOE plugin on W2K to run... - -- GPG ID CF7D6206 (CDD6 3225 3489 1305 D4D6 1CCF 50E8 6505 CF7D 6206) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys CF7D6206 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9dMXKUOhlBc99YgYRAuSjAJ4mjIfV24IBifwvUu4H5ELrnDR1XACgqdar 1zVXdCqUCwRS2I8EBod2HdU= =4YAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Josh Glover
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Godwin Stewart
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- References:
- [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Ulrich Plate
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Godwin Stewart
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links