Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:33:44 +0900
- From: Ulrich Plate <plate@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- References: <20020903012221.GD28108@example.com> <20020903040011.GC1996@example.com>
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 13:00, Jonathan Byrne wrote: > OK, question: If, as Josh notes, this is not an "issue" but just Mutt > being compliant with RFC 3156 and the problem is OE's for not being > so, is the end result of this patch then to make Mutt stop being > compliant with RFC 3156? I hope not, but what I find interesting are two things: 1. KMail interprets messages *with* the patch as PGP-signed, and when I reply to Scott's message the first line referring to the signature, while your Mutt without the patch sends the GPG signature in a way that gets interpreted as an attachment of unknown MIME type (Attachment 1). 2. More importantly (as a sign that there is confusion about where the signature starts and ends), when I reply to your mail, your key is kept in quoted lines: > GPG key: DF12B4EF (5399 C834 3ABB C3AF 610C 5345 D5D6 E6EA DF12 B4EF) > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys DF12B4EF while those lines are effectively suppressed when I answer to Scott. I really don't have much of a clue about all this, but I've checked my backlog, and I've found the same "issue" outside of Mutt, namely TLUGers using Ximian Evolution, Sylpheed and VM produce the same kind of behaviour in OE (and possibly KMail, but I don't have the same backlog here). It also happens with signed mails from people using Oort Gnus. I'm prepared to shut up and blame it on MS like everybody else, but it remains one hell of a problem if you consider OE the most wide-spread mailer around. Honestly, I don't think anybody can afford to shun half the net population just because they're not RFC compliant. I mean, I know what's going on only because the BSD dudes at the headquarter of my company educated me months ago, but most OE users are simply not in the picture and will probably panic and delete your mails as soon as they arrive. And certainly not know anyone who could explain what an RFC is. I'll try and get GPG running on all my machines until the weekend, including W2K and XP, and will report my experiences. Maybe the attachment issue disappears when the OE PGP plugin is present? Stay tuned. :-) Cheers Ulrich Plate
- References:
- [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Scott Robbins
- Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- From: Jonathan Byrne
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Followup on mutt and gpg
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links