Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp
Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?)
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:53:34 +0200
- From: Tobias Diedrich <td@example.com>
- Subject: [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?)
- References: <F223uv4wasfeIbm10V00000f8fe@example.com> <_JwPyB.A.FC.JrkL9@example.com> <20020712122417.53ea1480.Doughty_Michael@example.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
Michael Doughty wrote: > Yeah, except that the cached is referencing the swap space, not the > physical mem. I guess it might be a bit irritating that it's in the same line beginning with "swap:", but it's not related to swap anyway. Compare to free output, where buffers/cache is a seperate line. -- Tobias PGP: 0x9AC7E0BC
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that aBad Thing(tm)?)
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that aBad Thing(tm)?)
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- From: Jean-Christian Imbeault
- Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- From: Michael Doughty
- Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that aBad Thing(tm)?)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that aBad Thing(tm)?)
- Index(es):
| Home Page | Mailing List | Linux and Japan | TLUG Members | Links |