Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:24:17 +0900
- From: Michael Doughty <Doughty_Michael@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- References: <F223uv4wasfeIbm10V00000f8fe@example.com><_JwPyB.A.FC.JrkL9@example.com>
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:20:57 +0900, A.Sajjad Zaidi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:12:42PM +0900, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: > > > >> Mem: 516820K av, 512368K used, 4452K free, 0K shrd, 14648K > > >> buff > > >> Swap: 1052216K av, 15632K used, 1036584K free 333960K > > >> cached > > > > Where do you get those numbers from? top says 512368k used but you say I am > > only using 168212k? And where does 164MB and 326MB come from? > > The numbers are in the above output. > > used: 512368K > buff: 14648K > cached: 333960K > > Net Mem used = 512368K - 14648K - 333960K = 163760K > Yeah, except that the cached is referencing the swap space, not the physical mem. Michael
- Follow-Ups:
- [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?)
- From: Tobias Diedrich
- References:
- Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- From: Jean-Christian Imbeault
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] pure-ftpd login?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?
- Next by thread: [tlug] buffers & cache (was: Re: Memory 100% used. Is that a Bad Thing(tm)?)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links