Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- From: "M. Meiarashi" <mes@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:23:55 +0900 (JST)
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-reply-to: <87u1q55gfo.fsf@example.com>
- References: <20020421.212350.68564655.mes@example.com><87u1q55gfo.fsf@example.com>
In <87u1q55gfo.fsf@example.com>, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@example.com> wrote...: ; There have been such. I see. Well, I can see that those who send 'unsubscribe' message to the main list certainly didn't checked the webpage or the headers, footers whatever. But I couldn't see its converse... I mean why there are always some amount of people who get an idea that such command mail should be accepted by the main address, then make the idea into practice. ; The problem is that in many cases such bots would have unsubscribed ; both you, and then me. Do you mean the subject of this current thread of mail? Surely if it is parsed as a command, it would have been difficult to discuss about unsubscribing. ; M> I am just wondering why, in any lists, I see so many people ; M> sending such command mails ubiquitously. ; ; Because they're self-centered people who think that others should do ; everything for them, and/or they've got more nerve than brain. I'm not sure... I know nothing about neurology... :-) ------ M. Meiarashi -- mes@example.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- From: Jonathan Byrne
- References:
- Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- From: M. Meiarashi
- Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] unsubscribe
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links