Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:15:19 +0100
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010619190411.D11965@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <HiUN6B.A.wDH._YyL7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 07:04:11PM +0900, Matt Doughty wrote: > However, just because they aren't legally bound to be honest don't you find > it to be objectionable behavior? It's advertising. I *expect* advertising to be untrue. Don't you? The only reason it's particularly notable in this case is that it reinforces people here's prejudices against Microsoft. We should treat this as an admission that we've won, rather than an excuse to point fingers and say how nasty they are.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- From: Peter Evans <peter@example.com>
- Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- References:
- Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- From: Matt Doughty <mdoughty@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- Next by Date: Problem - Server stops
- Prev by thread: Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- Next by thread: Re: IS MICROSOFT SECRETLY USING OPEN SOURCE?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links