Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Kernel patches
- To: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
 - Subject: Kernel patches
 - From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
 - Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:29:41 +0900
 - Cc: "TLUG mailing list" <tlug@example.com>
 - Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 - In-Reply-To: <01ab01c0ee58$75b17230$0f01a8c0@example.com>
 - References: <01ab01c0ee58$75b17230$0f01a8c0@example.com>
 - Reply-To: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-From: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-Message-ID: <wA8WAC.A.JRF.BpeH7@example.com>
 - Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
 
>>>>> "SN" == SN Diamond <Norman.Diamond@example.com> writes: SN> patch-2.4.4.bz2 was about 1.7MB in size. patch-2.4.5.bz2 is SN> about 0.8MB in size. But the contents of the patch file look SN> like it should still be applied to the 2.4.0 sources not to SN> the 2.4.4 sources. SN> What am I missing? Looks like somebody reverted a big mistake. Try it with --dry-run (or whatever the appropriate flag is). -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
 
- Kernel patches
 
- From: "SN_Diamond" <Norman.Diamond@example.com>
 Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: ADSL again
 - Next by Date: Re: ADSL again
 - Prev by thread: Kernel patches
 - Next by thread: Re: Kernel patches
 - Index(es):
 
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links