Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Partition size
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Partition size
- From: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:21:49 +0200
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20010605144012.80798.qmail@example.com>; from jake_morrison@example.com on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 07:40:12AM -0700
- Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Diedrich <ranma@example.com>, tlug@example.com
- References: <000701c0edc8$ad38d940$fb44703d@example.com> <20010605144012.80798.qmail@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <_4bVYC.A.TJE.FeQH7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
Jake Morrison wrote: > The 2.4 kernel has problems reclaiming swap > pages, so it is better to have a two or That's not the only reason. It's also improves swap performance, because pages swapped in will still be in the swap partition, so if they get swapped out again, they don't have to be written to disk because they are still there. Which means if you want to have x megs swap and your physical mem is y megs, the swap partition should be at least x+y megs. -- Tobias nya~ni ?
- References:
- Partition size
- From: "Liton" <leyton@example.com>
- Re: Partition size
- From: Jake Morrison <jake_morrison@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Partition size
- Next by Date: RE: SPARCstation 5 - where to start?
- Prev by thread: Re: Partition size
- Next by thread: Re: Partition size
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links