Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: kapm-idled
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: kapm-idled
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 17:32:19 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Organization: Kobe University, Japan
- References: <15130.28788.376059.720336@example.com> <3B1B2E4E.98B1F4E2@example.com> <20010604164539.A1243@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <87rthC.A.Y3G.8c0G7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: boti
Christopher SEKIYA wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:44:30PM +0900, B0Ti wrote: > > It's sending HLT commands to the cpu. Read more about this at: > Dumb design. The kernel scheduler does that anyway. But actually it does more than that. AFAIK it uses the apm bios also, so I guess it should save more energy than just a plain HLT in the kernel scheduler. Maybe I should put it back in the kernel too if I get longer battery life that way. So why do you say that the design is dumb, Chris? -- B0Ti.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kapm-idled
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
- References:
- kapm-idled
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
- Re: kapm-idled
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Re: kapm-idled
- From: Christopher SEKIYA <wileyc@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: kapm-idled
- Next by Date: Re: kapm-idled
- Prev by thread: Re: kapm-idled
- Next by thread: Re: kapm-idled
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links