Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" <jean_christian@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 03:10:47 -0000
- Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <1qRoNC.A.RFC._SGF7@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Bingo ^_^ I guess this is a value-added feature of bash ... Jc >From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com> >Reply-To: tlug@example.com >To: tlug@example.com >Subject: Re: Bug in RH which cmd? >Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:54:43 +0900 > >Try using > ># hash -r > >If you've executed named in the current shell, before installing the new >version, the path to it is remembered in the hash table in bash. which is >an external command so it will search the path. if you type "hash" with no >options you'll see what is there. > >Tom. > >On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:21:26AM -0000, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: > > Ok, I know it must something really simple but I just can't seem to wrap >my > > head around the following seemingly strange behaviour of my Linux box. > > > > I just installed BIND 9.1.2 (I had 9.1.0 installed) and now when I >inquire > > named to find out which version it is I get 9.1.0 back ... so I check a >few > > this [see below...] > > > > [root@example.com bind-9.1.2]# /usr/local/sbin/named -v > > BIND 9.1.2 > > [root@example.com bind-9.1.2]# which named > > /usr/local/sbin/named > > [root@example.com bind-9.1.2]# named -v > > BIND 9.1.0 > > > > So it seems to me that my shell correctly points to the proper named. >But > > the version number I get back is different depending on wether I call it > > with the full path name or let the shell find out where it is. Why is >this? > > > > which -a named gives me all the named's I have > > > > [root@example.com samba]# which -a named > > /usr/local/sbin/named > > /usr/sbin/named > > /usr/local/sbin/named > > /usr/sbin/named > > > > But man which clearly says: > > > > >it prints to stdout the full path of the executables > > >that would have been executed when this argument had been > > >entered at the shell prompt. > > > > Is there a bug in "which"? > > > > Jc > > > > >_________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Next Technical Meeting: Sat, May 12 13:30- > > Next Nomikai Meeting: Fri, June (TBA) 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki Mae > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan > > > >-- >Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com >tom@example.com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >Next Technical Meeting: Sat, May 12 13:30- >Next Nomikai Meeting: Fri, June (TBA) 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki Mae >----------------------------------------------------------------------- >more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan > _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- Next by Date: Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- Prev by thread: Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- Next by thread: Re: Bug in RH which cmd?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links