TLUG Mailing List

Mailing List Archive
Support open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?

To: tlug@example.com

Subject: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?

From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>

Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 18:23:01 +0900

Content-Disposition: inline

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

In-Reply-To: <20010517175855.E28296@example.com>; from jq@example.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:58:55PM +0900

References: <990022020.3b0289844392a@example.com> <20010517175855.E28296@example.com>

Reply-To: tlug@example.com

Resent-From: tlug@example.com

Resent-Message-ID: <9i7n_.A.JeB.1e5A7@example.com>

Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com

User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:58:55PM +0900, Jonathan Q wrote:
> minimal, just filter outoing port 25 and anything your AUP

Why filter outgoing 25? Presumably you are trying to stop customers
who are potential spammers from directly sending email avoiding
your mail servers and filters. If my ISP blocked any outgoing ports
I'd move on... I consider it basic privacy and usually throw in PGP
for good measure. Why not have a good policy against spammers instead
and terminate them on valid claims of spam with some extra fines 
thrown in for good measure. Freedom...

Tom.
-- 
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom@example.com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
Follow-Ups:

Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>

Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>

References:

Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
From: sven@example.com

Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?
From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Samba on 7.1 not working :(

Next by Date: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?

Prev by thread: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?

Next by thread: Re: Cisco 2611 as a firewall?

Index(es):

Date

Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links