Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Postgres 7.1?
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Postgres 7.1?
- From: SL Baur <steve@example.com>
- Date: 13 Mar 2001 14:38:48 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: "Thomas O'Dowd"'s message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:45:06 +0900"
- Mail-Copies-To: never
- References: <3AAC2A97.4B0C7F73@example.com> <3AACA164.1BE7DB2E@example.com> <3AACB82E.24AE9F17@example.com> <3AAD9187.18FC63C9@example.com> <20010313124506.Z686@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <x5BIUB.A.pTD.gJbr6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Thomas O'Dowd <tom@example.com> writes in tlug@example.com: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:18:31PM +0900, A.Sajjad Zaidi wrote: >> > Any stability problems? >> >> No, looks pretty stable. We did have a few problems with importing data. It >> was a 7.0.3 dump with some Japanese data and 7.1b kept failing on some >> characters. > Interesting, what encoding were you using for the Database? I just imported my 7.0.3 moderate-sized database which includes edict into 7.1beta5 and it worked just fine. That was with EUC_JP encoding.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Postgres 7.1?
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- References:
- Postgres 7.1?
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- Re: Postgres 7.1?
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Re: Postgres 7.1?
- From: Darren Cook <darrenj@example.com>
- Re: Postgres 7.1?
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Re: Postgres 7.1?
- From: "Thomas O'Dowd" <tom@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Postgres 7.1?
- Next by Date: NTFS partion resizing
- Prev by thread: Re: Postgres 7.1?
- Next by thread: Re: Postgres 7.1?
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links