Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: ramen worm
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: ramen worm
- From: "A.Sajjad Zaidi" <sajjad@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:32:23 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
- Organization: Vanguard K.K.
- References: <200101190204.f0J24ZT12545@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <3o8fNC.A.22.LV7Z6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: sajjad
This is where I liked TurboLinux, although I wouldnt use it myself. It had ssh already installed, but everything was disabled. No telnet, ftp, ssh ....... Simply enabling these services in /etc/inetd.conf didnt help since you also had to allow the service through tcp_wrappers. RedHat should follow similar settings by default and have an option to enable these during the install to make it easier for newbies. But with RedHat I understand thats its not really the settings, but the vulnerabilities in the packages they include that make it insecure. I hate to say this, but even Windoze has telnet disabled by default while on RedHat I have to install ssh and disable telnet everytime. Joerg Winkelmann wrote: > Usually, when there is a virus, a trojan or some other > nasty beast going around, one reads: This affects only > Windows systems. > Now it is the other way around: One must read that > the Ramen worm affects only Linux machines and that > Microsoft Windows systems are secure . :-( > > Why is this Ramen worm possible? > >From the information I could find, it seems that the > Ramen worm attacks RedHat 6.2 and 7.0 systems which are running > versions of rpc.statd and ftpd which are vulnerable. > There will be always bugs and there will also be always > many people using Linux on personal computers not bothering > too much to install all security patches immediately. > Therefore the default configurations of Linux distributions > should be as secure as possible, and this is the point where, > in my opinion, RedHat ( and other distributors) have failed. > Why are these daemons (rpc.statd, ftpd) running at all in a > default configuration? > To use ftpd to provide an anonymous ftp server is probably > not something the average RedHat user has in mind. > Using ftpd for non-anonymous password-authorized file transfer > should not be done anyway, one should use scp instead. > Thus, while a Linux distribution should certainly contain ftpd, > I can not see why ftpd should be running by default. > The default, for all internet services not absolutely necessary > should be not to be started unless explicitly requested. > Whoever wants to start an ftp server (or Web server, or NFS server > or ...) should be able to do so in a few number of easy steps, > but the number of these steps should not be zero. > > Just my 0.02 $ > > Joerg > -- > e-mail: jwinkel@example.com > Web: http://www.math.unibas.ch/~winkel/index.html > > Postal Adress (valid until Sep 2001): > Joerg Winkelmann > Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences > University of Tokyo > Komaba, Meguro, Tokyo 153-8914 > Japan > Tel.: 00-81-3-5465-7030 > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Next Technical Meeting: Sat, January 20 13:30- LinuxProbe Hall > Next Nomikai Meeting: Fri, February 16 19:30- Tengu Tokyo Eki Mae > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ramen worm
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: ramen worm
- From: Joerg Winkelmann <jwinkel@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Network problem: hard or soft?
- Next by Date: Re: Wnn problem
- Prev by thread: Re: ramen worm
- Next by thread: Re: ramen worm
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links