Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: everything broken
- To: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- Subject: Re: everything broken
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 10:56:07 +0900
- Cc: tlug@example.com
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <3A41F22F.8CE4AA5D@example.com>
- References: <3A41D7BD.6AB9344@example.com><14913.55688.110174.929068@example.com><3A41F22F.8CE4AA5D@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <D_hfwB.A.Fs.SWrQ6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "B0Ti" == B0Ti <9915104t@example.com> writes: B0Ti> Why would it hurt to let configure pass and start compiling B0Ti> no matter what version the kernel headers are? Because they support it. Get it through your head: this is not somebody's personal hobby any more. This is business. B0Ti> If it chokes during compile, I wouldn't blame anyone. You're sure bitching a lot here! Look, it's an IQ test. If you can't figure out how to wank the kernel headers you've got into the glibc compile, you have no business compiling with anything but the standard headers. I know you can pass that test; so just do it. B0Ti> And what if I have different but still "known good" kernel B0Ti> headers other than 2.2.15. Or is it the only kernel that B0Ti> glibc will accept? And afaik woody comes with a different B0Ti> kernel, it would be the maintainers job to change the B0Ti> glibc-debian patch to let it compile with different kernel B0Ti> headers. So I just don't get it. :-O There will be a kernel-headers package somewhere, glibc should depend on it. I'm sure there's a statement on this somewhere in the glic sources and also in the Debian dev guide. I just trust Ulrich on this one. B0Ti> xdvik-ja is the same as yours. I suspect (according to B0Ti> strace) that the segfault is caused by some fonts. Should I B0Ti> downgrade latex (how?) or get/purge font packages ? Remove the offending fonts from your fontpath: xset -fp /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/horked-fonts (See man xset for more details.) Then try running xdvi. B0Ti> (II) LoadModule: "v4l" B0Ti> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/linux/v4l_drv.o B0Ti> (II) Module v4l: vendor="The XFree86 Project" cool. B0Ti> (II) LoadModule: "dga" B0Ti> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module dga B0Ti> (II) UnloadModule: "dga" B0Ti> (EE) Failed to load module "dga" (module does not exist, 0) Hrm. Maybe your installation is broken? B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension LBX B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont B0Ti> (II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER All looks cool to me. My guess is that XVideo is an extension supplied by v4l which requires DGA. When the DGA module went missing, XVideo went AWOL too. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
- everything broken
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
- everything broken
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: everything broken
- From: B0Ti <9915104t@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [Sheflug] Twas the night before startup
- Next by Date: Re: "restarting" scsi/Pine & reply-to
- Prev by thread: Re: everything broken
- Next by thread: everything broken
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links