Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:18:37 +0000
- Content-Disposition: inline
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <20001114042446.A5439@example.com>; from jq@example.com on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:24:46AM +0900
- References: <20001113134542.A16906@example.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.10011130944150.1460-100000@example.com> <20001114042446.A5439@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <fo5gSC.A.-0E.XbHE6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
- Sender: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:24:46AM +0900, Jonathan Q wrote: > At least some do, but of course that's just shell envy because they wish > they had a shell that good :-) > > I second that about tcsh; it's the next best thing to bash. Because, of > course, it behaves more like bash than those other shells do :-) So, you've not come across zsh, then? :) </jihad> -- If a 6600 used paper tape instead of core memory, it would use up tape at about 30 miles/second. -- Grishman, Assembly Language Programming
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- References:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] email forwarding?
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux (another question)
- Prev by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links