Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Jonathan Q <jq@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 04:24:46 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10011130944150.1460-100000@example.com>; from sstone@example.com on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 09:44:56AM -0800
- References: <20001113134542.A16906@example.com> <Pine.GSO.4.05.10011130944150.1460-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <32Mm8B.A.coE.ZBEE6@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Scott M. Stone (sstone@example.com) wrote: Scott> but freeBSD does come with tcsh. Most people in the UNIX world look upon Scott> bash as something that "only linux weenies use". I've run across that At least some do, but of course that's just shell envy because they wish they had a shell that good :-) I second that about tcsh; it's the next best thing to bash. Because, of course, it behaves more like bash than those other shells do :-) Jonathan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- References:
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: Simon Cozens <simon@example.com>
- Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- From: "Scott M. Stone" <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by Date: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Prev by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Next by thread: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links