Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jq@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:50:48 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010240112390.5505-100000@example.com>; from devin@example.com on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 01:14:23AM -0500
- References: <FOEBIKDLMFBGOKGGBGDECEIHCHAA.jshore@example.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010240112390.5505-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <vM7r6C.A.DgH.YTT95@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
Tod McQuillin (devin@example.com) wrote: > Thanks for the info Jonathan. Do you know which ports are blocked > exactly? If they block them (and David B. said they do in his post), it would be the well-known ports; that is, those numbered below 1024. > Looks like I may have to buckle down and spend 32,000 a month (plus the > setup and new NTT line costs -- ouch!) Still a bargain when you consider that OCN costs about that much and and has no service level guarantee. The main reasons that it costs that much to have commercial, server-OK DSL are along the lines of: 1) That takes more upstream bandwidth from the service provider when servers are being run by the DSL customers, and the increased traffic probably will require a bigger router; 2) It's a value-added service; people running servers are generally doing so either to make a profit directly (ebusiness, etc.) or in support of something that makes a profit. I know that doesn't help us hobbyists who are just running a server for fun, but service providers can't (as a business model) be policing the consumer DSL pool for servers that are hobbyist and OK, and others that are business-oriented and not OK. The only practical dividing line is to have a consumer DSL pool which is run just like their dial-up pools (no servers, etc.) and a commercial pool that is run like their leased line pool (you get a handful of routable IP addresses and can run any kind of server you want); 3) When a service provider that also offers ISDN leased lines and fixed-IP dialup services starts offering DSL with fixed-IP and server usage, it can probably expect those business areas to take a major hit, since DSL will deliver more bang for less buck. But service providers do need to make money, and those other services are usually important to that, so if the revenue for those services gets decimated by business-grade DSL, then DSL also has to make up that shortfall. Even at 32,000 yen per month, that's far cheaper and a whole lot faster than a 128K ISDN leased line, so while that hurts a bit for a hobbyist, it's not a bad deal relatively. Jonathan
- References:
- RE: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- RE: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- From: Tod McQuillin <devin@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- Next by Date: Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- Prev by thread: RE: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- Next by thread: Re: Metallic DSL in Tokyo
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links