Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: bzip2 vs gzip
- To: <tlug@example.com>
 - Subject: Re: bzip2 vs gzip
 - From: "Ulrike Schmidt" <ulrike@example.com>
 - Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 12:31:55 +0900
 - Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002A_01C0305A.93F87F20"
 - Reply-To: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-From: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-Message-ID: <ISuFlD.A.AhG.GXp35@example.com>
 - Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
 
> I was surprised to find several corrupt bzipped files on my system. Surprised
> that they had been corrupted, not that they were there. bzip2recover couldn't
> save them, either. As far as I can tell, whatever damaged the bzipped files did
> not harm gzip and zipped files (not sure what it was). Is Bzip2 less resilient
> than gzip?I had a problem with corrupted bzip2 files which I downloaded from the internet with Netscape, on a Windows machine however. When I used another ftp program I got them down ok. I never had this problem with gziped files, but with a debian package I had the same problem. I think there must be a way to get Netscape download bzip2 etc. ok, just don't know exactly how.Uli
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: bzip2 vs gzip
 - Next by Date: Re: German umlauts in japanese RedHat 6.2 don't work
 - Prev by thread: bzip2 vs gzip
 - Next by thread: German umlauts in japanese RedHat 6.2 don't work
 - Index(es):
 
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links