Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]bzip2 vs gzip
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: bzip2 vs gzip
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:25:08 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010061028180.1798-100000@example.com>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010061028180.1798-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <c8CcSC.A._dF.EfV35@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Laszlo <laszlo@example.com> writes: Tony> Is Bzip2 less resilient than gzip? It's certainly newer. It might be less reliable. So far I have never seen a corrupt .gz or .bz2 that couldn't be explained by pilot error (appending non-compressed text to a compressed file, for example) or an overfull file system. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen, though. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
- bzip2 vs gzip
- From: Tony Laszlo <laszlo@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: Open Source
- Next by Date: Re: bzip2 vs gzip
- Prev by thread: bzip2 vs gzip
- Next by thread: Re: bzip2 vs gzip
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links