Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]bzip2 vs gzip
- To: tlug@example.com
 - Subject: bzip2 vs gzip
 - From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
 - Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 13:25:08 +0900 (JST)
 - Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 - Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 - In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010061028180.1798-100000@example.com>
 - References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010061028180.1798-100000@example.com>
 - Reply-To: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-From: tlug@example.com
 - Resent-Message-ID: <c8CcSC.A._dF.EfV35@example.com>
 - Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
 
>>>>> "Tony" == Tony Laszlo <laszlo@example.com> writes: Tony> Is Bzip2 less resilient than gzip? It's certainly newer. It might be less reliable. So far I have never seen a corrupt .gz or .bz2 that couldn't be explained by pilot error (appending non-compressed text to a compressed file, for example) or an overfull file system. Doesn't mean it couldn't happen, though. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."
- References:
 
- bzip2 vs gzip
 
- From: Tony Laszlo <laszlo@example.com>
 Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: RE: Open Source
 - Next by Date: Re: bzip2 vs gzip
 - Prev by thread: bzip2 vs gzip
 - Next by thread: Re: bzip2 vs gzip
 - Index(es):
 
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links