Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Licensing Issue
- To: <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Licensing Issue
- From: "Jonathan Shore" <jshore@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 10:51:17 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <14809.46583.647013.75194@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Resent-From: tlug@example.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <pyA7fB.A.wu.Y8o25@example.com>
- Resent-Sender: tlug-request@example.com
> From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:turnbull@example.com] > No. It must be distributed, or the clause does not apply. If it > stays within e-shuppan.com, he can require NDAs of his employees and > probably does not have to give them access to source.[1] He can > refuse to deal with third parties who won't sign NDAs, as well, > although he has to give them source. First, yes, I am not building software for distribution, rather I need a multimedia platform with specific capabilities. The work I described previously is just a means to an end (unrelated to the software business). Secondly, I note that there are commercial products built on Mozilla (TopStyle, Netscape 6, etc). If they are providing source they are certainly not advertising it. I was not able to find sources for either of the above products at least with the cursory searches I did. As for the mozilla license, I have not yet read it in full. Whether I need to provide source back or not is not a paramount issue. It may be for this forum though.
- References:
- Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- Next by Date: [Group Etiquette]
- Prev by thread: Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- Next by thread: RE: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links