Re: Linux/Mozilla related Short-Term Contract

["Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>]

>>>>> "cs" == Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com> writes:

    cs> How about that, huh?  By definition, any modification you make
    cs> to mozilla is considered an "open source modification".

No.  It must be distributed, or the clause does not apply.  If it
stays within e-shuppan.com, he can require NDAs of his employees and
probably does not have to give them access to source.[1]  He can
refuse to deal with third parties who won't sign NDAs, as well,
although he has to give them source.


Footnotes: 
[1]  I'm talking legalities here, not Jonathan's intentions.

-- 
University of Tsukuba                Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences       Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________  _________________  _________________  _________________
What are those straight lines for?  "XEmacs rules."