Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:57:37 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <14658.5692.865820.616887@example.com>
- References: <200006100919.e5A9Jau06140@example.com><20000610183734.B21763@example.com><14658.5692.865820.616887@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug
>>>>> "Viktor" == Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com> writes: Viktor> Consider this situation. I've not used any opearating Viktor> system at home but linux for three years (it was a Mac Viktor> before that). My kids go to a friend's house and play very Viktor> nice games on Windows, they come home and ask me to Viktor> install those games here. How can you explain kids that Viktor> Windows is bad and linux is good??? You can't. A PS2 (not PS/2 ;) beats Windows hands-down for those kids whose friends have Playstations but not Windows boxes; that's not going to change. Nor is the fact that most kids parents can barely handle Windows, let alone hack *nix. Anyway, Windows isn't bad if it's used for playing games. The games market is a perfect example of the kind of market where freedom of software is close to irrelevant, except in principle. What you can do is try to get your kids interested in aspects of computers other than games. Warning: for some kids, it will never work. Vive la difference! (And I don't mean gender.) And also try to get them interested in games that run on Linux. Warning: that is very expensive in terms of Poppa's time. Kids (little ones, anyway) are interested in computers, even computer games, primarily for the social interaction. So far, though, my daughter's favorite platform is Sparc ROM. She likes making all the LEDs on the keyboard light up. YES! An abstract gamer! Viktor> I'm doing my best. My wife would like to use something an Viktor> ms office like thing. Viktor> She has to use linux and its xterms, and I don't expect Viktor> her to understand what's going on behind the curtains. That's OK as long as she has a competent sysop to rely on. My wife uses Windows; I'm not willing to spend enough time on building her a usable environment (she used to do CAD for money; AutoCAD is unacceptably primitive to her---I don't think it's going to be easy to build an acceptable environment in Linux, even at several times the price). Viktor> I like current desktop development even if it hurts a bit Viktor> the system itself. I don't think anybody is arguing against desktops in user space. What Chris, Scott, and I oppose are AI (Artificially Idiotic) system administration tools. All of us have written scripts, installation tools, and the like. Scott for sure has put "user-friendly interfaces" on them. But we see those as ways of automating what a well-informed admin can do in her sleep, _knowing that it is safe_ to do it while asleep. In principle, I (speaking for myself) accept the idea that developers should strive to make computers as easy to operate as a car. But that means limiting their capabilities to what the user has intuition for. As we all know, the basis for many "licensed" drivers' intuitions about physics is rather shaky. But you can _see_ everything that a car can hurt; you can feel it when you lose control. Those things are _not_ true about networked computers. Joe Random Luser has _zero_ intuition for the harm his computer can do. We've seen several recent examples right here on this list; some even have gone so far as to demonstrate their lack of intuition about security and ethical responsibilities when using others' systems in excruciating detail. I don't think that a license should be required to run Linux (or any other operating system) on your _personal_ computer; but it is a useful thought experiment to consider whether one should be required to attach that computer to a network, and what the license examination would be like. -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting (w/ YLUG): June 16 (Fri) 19:00 Mizonoguchi Marui Family 12F Next Technical Meeting: July 8 (Sat) 13:30 Topic: TBA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://www.tlug.gr.jp Sponsor: Global Online Japan
- References:
- tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- From: Austin Kurahone <austin@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- From: Viktor Pavlenko <vp@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Re: [sendmail-security@example.com: Sendmail Workaround for Linux Capabilities Bug]
- Next by Date: tlug: /dev/ftape and grandchildren
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: MS ordered split
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links