Re: [Lingo] [OT] List archive

["Josh Glover" <jmglov@example.com>]

On 05/04/2008, Daniel A. Ramaley <daniel.ramaley@example.com> wrote:

> Though there is effectively no difference in providing the
>  information, forwarding someone's e-mails to a 3rd party without
>  explicit permission from the sender somehow seems a bit rude compared
>  to pointing said 3rd party to the publicly accessible archive.

Right, because the public archive is explicitly public, whilest email
is implicitly private. Emails to a public mailing list should be
considered public, but many people don't.

-- 
Cheers,
Josh