Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Pentium 2 vs old Pentium
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Pentium 2 vs old Pentium
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 16:00:14 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981209155600.17300i-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Scott Stone wrote: > not for all of them, no. A K5-100 would probably be okay, though. Wouldn't be worth the trouble of tracking one down. K5s were only incrementally better than their pentium counterparts. AMD got bitten by the K5 very badly -- that's why it didn't last too long on the market. -- Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------ Next Technical Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 at Temple Univ. Japan *NEW LOCATION* a map is available at http://www.tuj.ac.jp/maps.html Next Nomikai: 15 January 1999, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 ------------------------------------------------------------------ more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsor: PHT
- References:
- Re: tlug: Pentium 2 vs old Pentium
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Pentium 2 vs old Pentium
- Next by Date: tlug: mailing list vs cpu power
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Pentium 2 vs old Pentium
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Pentium 2 vs old Pentium
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links