Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:59:27
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- In-Reply-To: <13899.54722.490653.528692@example.com>
- References: <3.0.6.32.19981113151530.0097fd30@example.com><3.0.6.32.19981113151530.0097fd30@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >Try the TL version. You need the TL-J version because Scott left out >Mule in the US version. No promises on that one because of >libc5/glibc confusion, unfortunately. It might work. > >ftp.pht.co.jp: >/pub/turbolinuxj/2.0/TurboLinux/RPMS/xemacs-20.4-3TL.i386.rpm Agh! 20Mb. It was to avoid big downloads that I bought a 6 CD set. Oh well. Shouganai kana. There is also something called xemacs-static-20... there, but as it is only 2.5Mb I guess it doesn't mean statically linked? ... Right, I downloaded that, and did the same "rpm -i xemacs...rpm" command, but it gives me the same two requirements, and now adds a third one: libcanna.so1.3 Is this the libc5/glibc confusion you mentioned? RedHat uses glibc, and I thought Turbo Linux was as well. Matt Gushee wrote: >distribution, I *always* build it from an SRPM (if not from a tar >archive). If you haven't built an SRPM before, it's usually quite easy The S stands for source? What exactly is an RPM? Is it (in windows terms) like a zip file of the precompiled binary version, where the "rpm -i" command does the unzip, double-clicks setup.exe and also decides the path to install it in for you? That was the assumption I was working under. I found an SRPM directory on the same CD, but no xemacs in there. >Building XEmacs from source is usually much easier than you might >expect -- and if you have a Pentium w/ plenty of RAM, doesn't take >much time either. The main problem is finding enough disk space. Of Building from source I've generally found to be easy. Type configure, then type make. Then run it. :-). But, I still have a couple of questions: 1.If I build from source, won't it still complain the .so files are missing when I try to run it? 2.Why would a source .tar.gz take more disk space than a precompiled version? Or is this something about xemacs that I've yet to discover. Gulp. Darren ---------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Technical Meeting: 12 December, 12:30 HSBC Securities Office ---------------------------------------------------------------- more info: http://tlug.linux.or.jp Sponsors: PHT, HSBC Securities
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- From: Matt Gushee <matt@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- Next by Date: tlug: Reading Japanese news with Western tin
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Beginner Q: rpm's and xemacs
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links