Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- To: TLUG mailing list <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 11:04:24 +0900
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981007093950.621W-100000@example.com>; from Scott Stone on Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 09:41:35AM +0900
- Mail-Followup-To: TLUG mailing list <tlug@example.com>
- References: <19981007091952.E11789@example.com> <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.981007093950.621W-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 09:41:35AM +0900, Scott Stone wrote: > On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Rex Walters wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 12:33:22AM +0900, Jonathan Byrne wrote: > > > > > > Without the floppy, it just sits there,stuck. Never gets to LILO. > > > > What does your lilo.conf look like? Have you tried the "linear" option. > > Be sure to rerun lilo if you change anything. > > > > Are you using some sort of multi-boot manager (system commander or > > somesuch) or are you jumping directly to lilo from the MBR? > > > > > LBA mode is enabled and fdisk now reports the 6.4 GB disk as being 787 > > > cyclinders times the unlikely head count of 0 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > This can't be right. Something is very wrong. > > It could be rolling over the maximum limit of what fdisk thinks the > maximum number of heads should be...? > > On a maxtor 8.4GB EIDE, I get: > > Without LBA: > 16 heads, 63 sectors, 16383 cylinders > > With LBA: > 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1021 cylinders 16 or 255 are normal. Zero is Abbie something (apologies to Mel Brooks). For an ATA drive not using LBA (or "Large") BIOS translations, the number of heads will *always* be 16. Regardless of what you're using num-cyls * num-heads * num-sec/track * 512 bytes/sec is the total available space in the drive. Zero for any of these is A Bad Thing (tm). What exactly do you have in your bios settings, and what exactly do fdisk and boot messages say the size and c/h/s are for your drive, Jonathan? Regards, -- REx --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
- Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: LILO Vs. 1024??
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links