Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 18:35:15 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980929155646.25403J-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Tue, 29 Sep 1998, Chris Sekiya wrote: >*snicker* I thought he might have been referring to me. Yeah, I thought he was too ;-) >Agreed, of course. If the massive influx of Linux users included a fair >amount of coders, then perhaps we wouldn't lose as much. Unfortunately, >though, such does not seem to be the case. Never is. The programmers are at the tip of a pyramid which grows from the top down. At least Linux will probably always have a thicker top than most other pyramids. >> I've also written that I think tools emphasizing ease-of-use often >> lead to technically poor output, at least when coupled with the >> "instant gratification" of WYSIWYG, but that's an orthogonal issue to >> those of "community." > >Again, agreed. Agreed that it's orthoganal or agreed that ease-of-use tools encourage a poor end product? If it's the second one, I don't buy into that, for two reasons. One is just that a person who doesn't know jack about how to not make an ugly page can make just as ugly of a page with TeX as they can with a graphical word processor, or a visual (but not graphical) one from the DOS days. Reason number two is that the very worst HTML I've ever seen - garbage even worse than what is produced by MS Office when it exports to HTML - was hand coded. If a person lacks competence, they will produce junk either way. A graphical word processor makes it easier to produce the junk, but the end result is about the same. A graphical word processor also makes it a lot easier to produce something good, if you know how. (Note: I do not apply this to WYSIWYG HTML editors, of which there are only two varieties: ones that suck and ones that really suck.) Cheers, Jonathan Byrne Media and Content Section 3Web - Your Internet Solution! <URL:http://www.threeweb.ad.jp/index.en.html> 3Web Channel <URL: http://www.3web.co.jp/index.en.html> --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Meeting: 10 October, 12:30 Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate Featuring the IMASY Eng. Team on "IPv6 - The Next Generation IP" Next Nomikai: 20 November, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 --------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- From: John De Hoog <washi@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linu
- From: Jim Schweizer <schweiz@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- From: Christopher Sekiya <wileyc@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- From: Neil Booth <NeilB@example.com>
- References:
- Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- From: Chris Sekiya <chris@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: Q about Linux on SPARCs
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Linux Users Old and New (was: High-end vs Low-end Linux)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links