Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]RE: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: RE: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 16:59:58 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <13807.37326.229459.961160@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Fri, 4 Sep 1998, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Schweizer <schweiz@example.com> writes: > > Jim> On 03-Sep-98 tjhaslam wrote: > >> I`ll put a \5000 bet on this: in 18 months time, starting say > >> now, MS announces (and possibly even introduces) its *own > >> version* of Linux >This is theoretically possible, but I don't think MS will do it. I <snip> I have to agree with this. While it is certainly possible for MS to build a Linux distribution, it is highly unlikely, for exactly the reason you mention: the stability and flexibility of Linux, combined with Microsoft's marketing muscle and the GUI already familiar to the hundreds of millions of Windows users would be stomping right on the toes of NT. Give it the full multimedia strengths of Windows and access to the huge development funds that MS has, and it would be a bullet aimed straight at the heart of NT. If MS introduce a Linux like that in 2000, NT would be history by 2005 at the latest, but probably a lot sooner. That, in turn, would destroy their current lineup, since Windows 98 is the last Windows based on the old DOS/Windows line, MS having stated that the next consumer/home user Windows will be built on an NT kernel. They'll never do it. >Think about the implications. MS programmers don't know how to write >a portable program, one that doesn't force the OS to adapt. That This one I'm not so sure about, though. Can you elaborate on this, and give some examples? Certainly, all of Microsoft's flagship software runs on multiple platforms (except IIS, which runs only under NT). But if we assume that MS programs are in fact non-portable as charged, isn't this more a case of "won't" than of "can't?" Certainly, MS could make things as portable as they felt like, but they believe (mostly correctly) that they are large and powerful enough that they can ignore precedent, create their own standards, and most of the world will go along. At least for right now, they are the 400 pound gorilla that can make a standard pretty much wherever it wants to. Jonathan Byrne Media and Content Section 3Web - Your Internet Solution! <URL:http://www.threeweb.ad.jp/index.en.html> 3Web Channel <URL: http://www.3web.co.jp/> -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Re: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- From: Karl-Max Wagner <karlmax@example.com>
- References:
- RE: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: New PHT web site
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: New PHT web site
- Prev by thread: RE: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- Next by thread: RE: tlug: Re: MS watching Linux and Borg revealations
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links