Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: wapuro space requirements [was: 'large' attachments]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: wapuro space requirements [was: 'large' attachments]
- From: Matt Gushee <matt@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 14:03:16 +0900
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <13804.48421.484712.198864@example.com>
- References: <19980901235431680.AAA118@example.com@example.com><13804.38497.858894.502509@example.com><13804.48421.484712.198864@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Stephen J. Turnbull writes: > On second thought, it's _not_ OK. I have one 1280x620 map in GIF > format, that's 17kB. A fancy photo-quality image in 256-color JPEG > might be 483kB, if you're really gung-ho (I have a 1280x899x128 at > 272kb). Where are the other 1.5MB going? Not into text.... > Hey, Applix/StarOffice/WPforLinux users: do your programs bloat data > that way? Hmm ... I was curious, so I took a quick look through my docs directory ... couldn't find any Applix Words files over 200kB. Thinking back to when I used WordPerfect for Windows ... hmm, the files I thought were big then were probably in the 100-300 kB range. It must be an MS Word thing ... which shouldn't be a surprise if you've ever seen the clots of frothing garbage spewed out by MS e-mail clients. On the other hand, it could be the GIF. If the author has the usual braindead image software and knows nothing about color reduction, etc ... a 1280x620 graphic could easily go to several hundred megs. Matt Gushee Oshamanbe, Hokkaido -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- tlug: Re: 'large' attachments
- From: Darren Cook <darren@example.com>
- tlug: Re: 'large' attachments
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- tlug: wapuro space requirements [was: 'large' attachments]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: wapuro space requirements [was: 'large' attachments]
- Next by Date: tlug: Question about resolv.conf
- Prev by thread: tlug: wapuro space requirements [was: 'large' attachments]
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: 'large' attachments
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links