Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Re: PCI [was: dual-pentium processors]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Re: PCI [was: dual-pentium processors]
- From: Karl-Max Wagner <karlmax@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 14:42:02 +0000 (GMT)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <19980813142331.58829@example.com> from "Rex Walters" at Aug 13, 98 02:23:31 pm
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
> What exactly does the PCI spec dictate? My friend made it sound like > they basically mandated an impedance mismatch/improper termination. I'm That alone is already bad enough. Scenario: you have a driver looking into a line with a Zo = 70 ohms. Termination is 150 ohms. It happens that some idiot designer designed the driver for being able to drive 150 ohms ONLY. However, what does the driver see at the first instant ? 70 ohms. result: driver overload and a staircased waveform which may or may not be within specs. Further result: erratic operation difficult to track down. > working on something using industrial single board computers and passive > PCI backplanes, and this talk is making me nervous. I'm going to need Well, PCI works....kinda. It's not a great scheme, though. However, you're not gonna have much choice, anyway. If they want PCI, they want it. Full stop. You just have the option to make the best out of it. However, check a bit how competent your vendor is in terms of rf engineering. Don't let them scare you by the usual big talk they use to impress people. Dig up what they REALLY know. Maybe use a scope and check their bus design. However, if you have the option of selecting VME instead, go for that ! It's a much better design. However, I fear they won't like the price tag..... > to select a passive PCI backplane vendor here shortly.... > > Any more info or references, Karl-Max? My RF experience is limited to OK. Stay tuned. I try to dig it up ASAP. > ham radio and sophomore EE courses (yikes! both around 15 years ago). I have been a ham for 22 years, too. I learned a lot that way. Email me privately if you need more detailed info. It's a bit far from Linux - although I don't dobt that it might be of interest to quite a few people. Karl-Max Wagner karlmax@example.com -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 18 September, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 10 October, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tlug: Re: PCI [was: dual-pentium processors]
- From: Hajime Saitou <hajime@example.com>
- References:
- tlug: Re: PCI [was: dual-pentium processors]
- From: Rex Walters <rex@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: Let's Note + TLJ2.0 (Re: tlug: gratitude)
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: Re: djb [was: ibm.net with LINUX (Red Hat)]
- Prev by thread: tlug: Re: PCI [was: dual-pentium processors]
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: Re: PCI [was: dual-pentium processors]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links