Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Success of Windows
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: tlug: Success of Windows
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 09:13:18 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <19980625085632.22623.qmail@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On 25 Jun 1998, Felix Morley Finch wrote: > >>In article <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980625163951.1656G-100000@example.com>, Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com> writes: > > > The success of the Macintosh and of Windows in the marketplace really > > has very little to do with the quality of the code or the stability of > > the OS, two areas where Linux (and indeed UNIX in general) wins hands > > down. They succeeded because of the GUIs they have (and Microsoft > > marketing muscle, in the case of Windows). > > Windows succeeded because way back when, Unix machines were too > expensive, and Apple kept such tight control of their platform that no > one else could clone the hardware. There was no other practical > choice for desktops, and Microsoft rode IBM's coattails, then Compaq's > coattails when IBM tried to steer the market towards MicroChannel, and > Intel's compatibility coattails ever since. > > I don't remember when Windows 3.1 became available, but up until then > Mickeysoft success rode the DOS wagon. I don't see the Windows GUI as > being any kind of key to success, other than being *a* GUI. It could > have been customizable to a fare-thee-well and it wouldn't have made > any difference in its success. Actually I think it rode the DOS wagon until 95 came out... 3.1 and 3.0 are fairly similar, except 3.1 crashes less often and has some extra wallpaper, or something like that :) > > IMHO of course :-) > > -- > ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. > Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@example.com > PGP = 91 B3 94 7C E9 E8 76 2D E1 63 51 AA A0 48 89 2F ITAR license #4933 > I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 > Next Meeting: 8 August, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 > featuring Linux on multiple platforms: > i386, Sparc, PA-Risc, Amiga, SGI, Alpha, PalmPilot, ... > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp > -------------------------------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com, sstone@example.com> <sstone@example.com> Linux Developer/Systems Administrator for Pacific HiTech, Inc. http://www.pht.com http://armadillo.pht.co.jp http://www.pht.co.jp http://www.turbolinux.com -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 8 August, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 featuring Linux on multiple platforms: i386, Sparc, PA-Risc, Amiga, SGI, Alpha, PalmPilot, ... -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- tlug: Success of Windows
- From: Felix Morley Finch <felix@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: bttv compatibility question
- Next by Date: Re: tlug: It works!
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: Success of Windows
- Next by thread: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links