Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- To: "Tokyo Linux Users' Group" <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- From: Scott Stone <sstone@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 17:46:24 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.980625163951.1656G-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Jonathan Byrne - 3Web wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Scott Stone wrote: > > >I would also argue that the UI diversity is one of the neat things about > >linux. I can make Linux look like whatever *I* want it to, not what some > > Well, I don't think that anyone is really arguing that such flexibility > ins't a good thing from the viewpoint of Linux hackers and hobbyist > users. Rather, the argument goes that the lack of a standardized GUI is > a barrier to commercial success, especially if you want to sell it to a > big company with thousands of computers. The IT manager, the tech > support manager, the IT staff who take care of all those users, want > thousands of computers that all look and work the same way and keep > everything in the same place. well, if THAT's your goal, then doesn't TurboLinux already satisfy it? Install TurboLinux on 1000 machines, don't f**k with any of the settings (as Steve put it earlier :) ), and they'll all look and act the same, won't they? Actually, couldn't the same be said for any Linux distribution? Or any OS? > > The success of the Macintosh and of Windows in the marketplace really > has very little to do with the quality of the code or the stability of > the OS, two areas where Linux (and indeed UNIX in general) wins hands > down. They succeeded because of the GUIs they have (and Microsoft > marketing muscle, in the case of Windows). Most users neither know nor > care about these technical issues. They just want a computer that's > easy to use and does what they want. Apple, and later Microsoft, gave > them that. The editorial on ZDNet that said that if IBM (for example) > were to deliver an Enterprise-oriented Linux the support and backing of > a powerhouse like IBM, they'd probably do very well and severely crimp > Microsoft's style. I think they really would, too. Compaq is another > company with the clout to do that, but IBM would be better. Well, personally I'd rather see PHT do it :) -------------------------------------------------- Scott M. Stone <sstone@example.com, sstone@example.com> <sstone@example.com> Linux Developer/Systems Administrator for Pacific HiTech, Inc. http://www.pht.com http://armadillo.pht.co.jp http://www.pht.co.jp http://www.turbolinux.com -------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 17 July, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next Meeting: 8 August, Tokyo Station Yaesu central gate 12:30 featuring Linux on multiple platforms: i386, Sparc, PA-Risc, Amiga, SGI, Alpha, PalmPilot, ... -------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsor: PHT, makers of TurboLinux http://www.pht.co.jp
- References:
- Re: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- From: Jonathan Byrne - 3Web <jq@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- Next by Date: Re: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- Prev by thread: Re: GUIs: Motif or ...? (was Re: tlug: Fw: Could Linux Kill NT?)
- Next by thread: tlug: Success of Windows
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links