Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: tlug: Naive VM and How to fake out Pine
- To: TLUG mailing list <tlug@example.com>
- Subject: Re: tlug: Naive VM and How to fake out Pine
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:50:33 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980429125204.186A-100000@example.com>
- References: <35475B05.CA9C5500@example.com><Pine.LNX.3.96.980429125204.186A-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Kei" == Kei Furuuchi <kfur@example.com> writes: Kei> Apr 29 02:13:21 seagate sendmail[2108]: GAA09092: Kei> to=tlug@example.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=2+19:22:18, Kei> xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=esmtp, relay=misc.twics.com., Kei> stat=Deferred: 418 <root@example.com>... unresolvable host Kei> name seagate.kei,check your setup. >>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull@example.com> writes: Stephen> What's happening is that TWICS's MTA (sendmail or smail Stephen> or qmail) is doing a DNS lookup on the address that your Stephen> machine gives in the HELO command of SMTP. You are Stephen> required to give a valid hostname according to RFC 1123, Stephen> so you're in violation, too. However, RFC 1123 Stephen> specifically forbids refusing mail on the basis of the Stephen> result of a lookup of that hostname. >>>>> "jdb" == J David Beutel <jdb@example.com> writes: jdb> Received: from kamishimo (jdb@example.com [202.237.149.171]) According to the analysis above, this should have been rejected. "kamishimo.twics.com doesn't exist (Authoritative answer)." jdb> by misc.twics.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id NAA14742 jdb> for <tlug@example.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:01:26 +0900 jdb> (JST) jdb> X-Sender: jdb@example.com jdb> From: "J. David Beutel" <jdb@example.com> jdb> Sender: owner-tlug@example.com It's not as simple as I thought. Evidently TWICS is applying different rules to TWICS lines than it does to everybody else. (sendmail can do this.) Or maybe not. Given the formats of the error and the Received: header in David's mail, I'm wondering if the problem isn't a failure of an IDENT check rather than the HELO line. (This is also weak as a spam check; every Windows IRC client known to man spoofs identd; I'm sure the spammers do so as well.) Kei, if you're _not_ running an identd daemon, you could try running one and see if that allows you to get through to TWICS. --------------------------------------------------------------- Next Nomikai: 15 May Fri, 19:30 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 03-3275-3691 Next TLUG Meeting: 13 June Sat, Tokyo Station Yaesu gate 12:30 Featuring Stone and Turnbull on .rpm and .deb packages --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- References:
- tlug: How to fake out Pine
- From: Jonathan Byrne <jpmag@example.com>
- Re: tlug: How to fake out Pine
- From: "J. David Beutel" <jdb@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: tlug: Server HD install
- Next by Date: Re: Broken HELO [was: tlug: Naive VM question]
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: How to fake out Pine
- Next by thread: Re: tlug: How to fake out Pine
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links