Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]tlug: comments on election of TLUG officers
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: tlug: comments on election of TLUG officers
- From: Craig Oda <craig@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 09:49:22 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Hi, at the last meeting, Joe Marchak, Ken Harada, John Little, and Jim Schweizer were elected as TLUG officers. The officers can affect the group for such things as allocation of finances, resources, and setting direction. While, it is best to open all votes up to all members on the mailing list, this is logistically difficult. We can give it a try though. However, at the last meeting, I went out to buy some chips and refreshments with TLUG funds. For things like this, it is better to get immediate voting. Perhaps more important is that we don't have good software to allow proper voting. E-mail voting can be fine, but in the past, we have not had too much success by using e-mail. Also, everyone is busy and usually just like to concentrate on the tech. :-) Due to the rapid expansion of the group and the desire for more focused projects, I put out nominations on the mailing list a few months ago. Since there was limited response, I brought up the elections at the meeting. One of the members sent me private e-mail, saying that elections should be held in the public on IRC or e-mail. I agree with this in theory. However, it is difficult to implement in practice. Raising hands at a meeting is rapid and efficient. Feel free to send me comments by private e-mail if you don't want to voice your objections on the list. Pending further objections, I will assume that people understand that the club is growing at a rapid rate and will accept the voting at the Feb meeting as a temporary procedure. Meaning that in 6 months we can vote again by a different procedure. I also received private e-mail commenting that TLUG should work toward becoming a larger, more established organization with funding, etc. To me, this meant that the person wanted TLUG to become something like an AEA or an ACM. As many of you are aware, I've been a promoter of an organizational style resembling anarchy and took a bit of pride in promoting TLUG meetings as disorganized and free. However, as the group grows, we may want to have a different style. I'm interested in receiving comments on this. Why not post them to this list? I've received excellent private e-mail about this and feel this should be brought up to the entire group for discussion. As proof that I'm flexible enough to move toward organization, I would like to comment that the TLUG financial balance sheets are being prepared by a professional financial analyst with more than five years professional accounting experience. So, if we grow, we'll be able to track every yen as a matter of public record. I've posted the balance sheet on the web for review. Remember, TLUG is your organization, so say what you think and make it the organization that you want it to be. Regards, Craig --- craig@example.com --------------------------------------------------------------- Next TLUG Nomikai: 11 March Wed 1998 Tengu TokyoEkiMae 19:30 Chuo-ku, Kyobashi 1-1-6, EchiZenYa Bld. B1/B2 03-3275-3691 Next TLUG Meeting: 11 April 1998 Saturday, Tokyo Station --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: domain for tlug (Re: tlug-digest V1 #769)
- Next by Date: tlug: video card warning
- Prev by thread: Re: tlug: TurboLinux 1.2 USA released
- Next by thread: tlug: video card warning
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links