Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: debian [was Re: tlug: Problems with Motif 2.0 and XFree86-3.3.1]
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: debian [was Re: tlug: Problems with Motif 2.0 and XFree86-3.3.1]
- From: Craig Oda <craig@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 19:00:05 +0900 (JST)
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
- In-Reply-To: <m0xbFsI-00000LC@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
On Fri, 28 Nov 1997, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > But especially at system installation, if you've got requirements the > RedHat maintainers haven't foreseen, it's really hard to get around > the inherent limitations. Most Debian stuff OTOH is implemented as > scripts and flat-file text databases; it's easy to figure out how to > do what you want by hand in the occasional case where it's needed. I completely agree with you here. Although I like the GNU attitude and community spirit of the Debian project, I'm still pretty practical when it comes to choosing a system I use every day, for most of the day. What made me switch from Red Hat to Debian was when I messed up the package database on Red Hat. I've done this a few times on Debian, but on Debian it is a flat file. On Red Hat, I think it was in a compressed or database format. Anyway, I remember that I was unable to open it up and look for the glitch. Also, the last time I tried Red Hat, I think it sets up its own configuration files for some things. Being Linux-based, anything I didn't like about Red Hat could be fixed. Both Debian and Red Hat are really good distributions and both have excellent dependency features. The reason I never went back to Red Hat was that I found the Debian-JP project and find that it is pretty fully developed. Other reasons are really minor, for example I like the Debian stance on GNOME and KDE. This is purely personal, and I think KDE will be very popular, but GNOME has that community spirit that first attracted me to Linux. On the other hand, IMHO Red Hat may make the best inroads into the corporate market, due to its popularity and corporate development structure. For example, looking at http://www.redhat.com, one of the big developments is that availability of vendor-backed commercial support contracts. On that same page there are announcements about commercial software from Netscape, Crack dot Com, and TriTeal CDE. I think that it is marvelous that there is competition and brand loyalty among different Linux distributions. At the next meeting on Dec. 13th we should have both Debian and Red Hat based machines. Cool, maybe someone can finally teach me how to use glint. Regards, Craig --------------------------------------------------------------- TLUG Meeting Dec. 13, 12:30 at Tokyo station Yaesu Chuo ticket gate 13:30 Starbuck's coffee. 13:45 HSBC | info: joem@example.com At least 3 functional Sparc IPC machines will be raffled out --------------------------------------------------------------- a word from the sponsor: TWICS - Japan's First Public-Access Internet System www.twics.com info@example.com Tel:03-3351-5977 Fax:03-3353-6096
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: debian [was Re: tlug: Problems with Motif 2.0 and XFree86-3.3.1]
- From: "Alan B. Stone" <stoneab@example.com>
- References:
- debian [was Re: tlug: Problems with Motif 2.0 and XFree86-3.3.1]
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: tlug: VDX C/C++ Software
- Next by Date: RE: Re[2]: tlug: Yutex
- Prev by thread: debian [was Re: tlug: Problems with Motif 2.0 and XFree86-3.3.1]
- Next by thread: Re: debian [was Re: tlug: Problems with Motif 2.0 and XFree86-3.3.1]
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links