Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Pentium Pro
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Pentium Pro
- From: Yuri Anissimov <cybernet@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 1996 15:20:47 +0900
- Cc: darren@example.com, TMatsumu@example.com
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>Yuri, > Try a name brand SMP system. We ensure compatibility with all name brand >PCI systems, often as we have pre-release versions of their systems, and >vice versa. > >BTW, I'll be in Taiwan next week meeting with a lot of MB manufacturers, but >I have no idea if I'll meet your MB vendor, what's the company name? - Thanks Ted, MotherBoard is some US made ~"microsystem" or whatever - have to look it up in the office Monday. Brands are good, I agree, but most of our customers are pretty much cost sensitive. You are the big guys, that is different. Besides I think that as far as Adaptec is a standard de-facto in SCSI world and makes the fashion - clonemakers should follow you. But you can make life a little easy for them, preserving some basic compatibility with older products if you are developing BIOSes so quickly. I am not a guru - policy of keeping compatibility with XT computers made PC clones so poor. Perhaps in 1 year from now new technology breakthrough will be over and we all could take a break. Just letting steam out. > >From: darren@example.com (Darren Cook) >Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 15:15:45 +0900 >Subject: Re: 686 processor > >Roughly how much does such a system cost? >Is it possible to by a motherboard in Akihabara and slot together my own >system? Or are dual processor systems something for the experts only? - System is VECTRON, costs around 600000Yen with 1.6 Gb IDE. Give me a call at 03-3668-8089 or you can drop at our office and have a look yourself (Ningyocho). I've never seen duals in Akihabara. But beware memory compatibility - most of the system uses ECC or Parity, or DIMM. >I read somewhere that the standard version of NT can cope with upto four >processors, so I assume there is no need to upgrade the operating system? - this is true for Win NT Server, Workstation supports only 2 CPUs. >And, to get back to the subject of this mailing list, can Linux take >advantage of dual processors? > >Darren. >From /usr/src/linux-pre2.0.2/Documentation/SMP.txt: >SMP support for Linux with up to 16 processors using the Intel MP >specification. -
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: re: Windows '95 MS Office or Freedom
- Next by Date: Mail: a question and an unrelated answer
- Prev by thread: re: Windows '95 MS Office or Freedom
- Next by thread: Re: Pentium Pro
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links