Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: 686 processor
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: 686 processor
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- Date: 31 May 96 12:32:00 EDT
- In-Reply-To: <31AE4C2C.7699@example.com>
- References: <Pine .HPP.3.91.960530192043.12883A-100000@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Form: Reply Text: (10 lines follow) Yuri, Try a name brand SMP system. We ensure compatibility with all name brand PCI systems, often as we have pre-release versions of their systems, and vice versa. BTW, I'll be in Taiwan next week meeting with a lot of MB manufacturers, but I have no idea if I'll meet your MB vendor, what's the company name? Ted Original text: (24 lines follow) >From owner-tlug@example.com, on 5/31/96 10:32 AM: C. Oda wrote: > 586 chips. Initial testing with a Windows testing device indicates > speeds of about 8 times faster than a 166mhz 586 > for 16 bit applications under Windows '95. - I am playing with Dual CPU 200 Pentium Pro for a couple a weeks now, Under NT this beast is really flying. It has a wide 4Gb Qauntum and AHA2940UW. Basically I like Adaptec's products, but recently this a real headache to deal with their PnP realizations (sorry, Ted) At the beginning I spent much more time praying than playing. But once you got card up and running, you can forget about it till the time comes to buy new machine, and the performance is great. (I am talking about bus mastering devices) Never tried the system with 95, but I thought that 95 kernel is 16 -bit, so the performance should be equal to P5-200 - am I wrong? What is it, Intel again creating himself a bad publicity? Yuri Anissimov, Cybernetech Corporation. 1-1-21 Ningyo-cho Nihombashi Chuou-Ku Tokyo 103, Japan tel. (81)-3-3668-8089, fax: (81)-3-3668-9872 e-mail: cybernet@example.com Use Proportional Font: true Previous From: owner-tlug@example.com Previous To: tlug@example.com Original to: tlug@example.com Attachment Count: 0 --$----Novell--Attachment----$ X-NVL-Content-Type: UNKNOWN X-NVL-Content-Typename: UNKNOWN X-NVL-Content-Charset: X-IBM-437 X-NVL-Content-Filename: ATTRIBS.BND X-NVL-Content-Transfer-Encoding: X-UUENCODE begin 777 ATTRIBS.BND M0F5Y;VYD(%!A8VME9"!!='1R:6)U=&5S`([]"$<P"@``````0F5Y;VYD(%!R M;W!R:65T87)Y($1A=&$:`````!$```````0`#0"F`0`````````````````` M````````3W)I9VEN86P@=&5X=%P$1@example.com`````````````E`$#`%P$C@$"``(` M```8``(``0`!`#4``````````@`V`"<$````````./\```````"0`0`````` M````35,@example.com%N<R!397)I9@``````````````````````````````./\````` M``"0`0``````````0V]U<FEE<@`````````````````````````````````` M`````0`!`#8``@`V`/=_`@!$`/=_`@!%`/=_`@"+`/=_`@"^`/=_`@#L`/=_ M`@#M`/=_`@`J`?=_`@!J`?=_`@"K`?=_`@#E`?=_`@`C`O=_`@!F`O=_`@"G M`O=_`@#H`O=_`@`J`_=_`@!K`_=_`@"I`_=_`@"U`_=_`@#>`_=_`@`5!/=_ M`@!"!/=_`@!=!/=_````````````````9``!I`$!2`,![`0!D`8!-`@!V`D! M?`L!(`T!Q`X!:!`!#!(!L!,!5!4!^!8```````````````!D``'@`0'``P&@ D!0&`!P%@"0%`"P$@#0$`#P'@$`'`$@&@%`&`%@%@&`%`&@`` ` end --$----Novell--Attachment----$--
- References:
- Re: 686 processor
- From: Yuri Anissimov <cybernet@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: re: Windows '95 MS Office or Freedom
- Next by Date: re: Windows '95 MS Office or Freedom
- Prev by thread: Re: 686 processor
- Next by thread: re: 686 processor
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links