Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: long quotes
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: long quotes
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 12:10 JST
- In-Reply-To: <199603201441.XAA14922@example.com> (schweiz@example.com)
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
X-Sender: schweiz@example.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 23:51:56 +1300 From: schweiz@example.com (Jim Schweizer) Sender: owner-tlug@example.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: tlug@example.com Hi all, Sorry, my mailer doesn't record who said what but, >> Best solution would be to have Majordomo reject such posts. You run a >> Majordomo list, don't you, Alberto? Check and see if you could advise >> Craig on how to work that up. > >Personally, I am against rejecting any post unless it is a big problem. >However, as always, majority rules. If the majority wants to put >special functions on the list, I'll look into it if time permits. I like getting Ted's posts, I hate it when I do that. I wasn't serious about censoring posts; what I meant was that it would be "most efficient" for Majordomo to do the censoring. I like getting Ted's posts too. I dislike the fact that he appends entire messages, but I don't blame him for that. Computers are supposed to make life easy ("Transparent Ted" being the foremost advocate in TLUG :-). Why should he have to go to the trouble of weeding out all the irrelevant content? And his mailer makes it easy for him to ignore it. His mailer also allows lines that are far too long for e-messages (space should be allowed for multiple quoting, and lines greater than about 65 characters in length are not ergonomic, that's why most printed matter is multicolumn). The mailer is at fault. There should be a software solution. The Draconian one is for Majordomo to reject those posts; there ought to be a better one (but I'm not sure what it is). And the problem for digest recipients is much more severe. and Eudora 1.4.3 seems to be having no problems reading the headers (or am I missing something here;-) I vote against special functions. What you're missing is apparently the "advanced mail system" implemented at Cyber ;-) ciao -- Stephen J. Turnbull Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Yaseppochi-Gumi University of Tsukuba http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/ Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, 305 JAPAN turnbull@example.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: long quotes
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- References:
- Re: long quotes
- From: schweiz@example.com (Jim Schweizer)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: long quotes
- Next by Date: Re: long quotes
- Prev by thread: Re: long quotes
- Next by thread: Re: long quotes
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links