Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Power Mac Port and Mach 3.0 kernel
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Power Mac Port and Mach 3.0 kernel
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 96 22:39 JST
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960210180647.9138A-100000@example.com> (message from Craig Oda on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:17:08 +0900 (JST))
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
>>>>> "Craig" == Craig Oda <craig@example.com> writes: Craig> I'm pretty impressed that the Power Mac port of Linux is Craig> using the Mach 3.0 kernel. Oh, then they're using the "Linux single server"? I'm not clear on what sense this is "Linux", then. But I didn't realize the LSS was industrial strength yet---that's cool. Maybe I'll try to one-up JWT and do that, too! (I sure can't keep up with his kernel-hopping....) One thing is you get industrial quality threads for free.... (At least if I understand the theory of Mach correctly.) Craig> I've really found the Macs lacking in many areas and avoid [snip] Craig> For all the flack I give the Mac, I have to admit that the Craig> way the toolbox forces programmers to conform to certain Craig> menu conventions gives the Mac a more unified feel across Craig> applications. It's not like these two things are unrelated. If you want everything to look the same and achieve hardware plug and play (I saw my first self-designed system based on MS/Intel Plug-n-Play yesterday (all components were alleged to be PnP); almost needless to say, it didn't work that way, the poor guy even had to set hardware jumpers(!); the sound blaster still doesn't work quite right, and since it's PnP, the docs assume things are going to work correctly), force everything to go through a toolkit and make that toolkit proprietary. That's why the Mac is the computer for people who don't *ever* want to know the revision number of their kernel, or even whether they're editing using MS Word or Ichitaro. Unfortunately, getting background processing right, let alone real multitasking, makes this very very hard, as everybody I know who runs a Mac network has found out. Anyway, PowerMac Linux won't look like a Mac. It'll look like <gasp> Linux. "All" you get is access to a different hardware architecture and lilo will ask you if you want MacOs, along with Linux 1.4.7 or 1.5.42, instead of Win, Lose, or Draw95. (Sorry guys, you need Intertemporal FTP to get those kernels at the moment.) Steve
- References:
- Power Mac Port and Mach 3.0 kernel
- From: Craig Oda <craig@example.com>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Java Dev Kit Win '95 or Linux
- Next by Date: Java Resources
- Prev by thread: Power Mac Port and Mach 3.0 kernel
- Next by thread: Re: Power Mac Port and Mach 3.0 kernel
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links