Mailing List ArchiveSupport open source code!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: Linux vs BSD
- To: tlug@example.com
- Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD
- From: TMatsumu@example.com
- Date: 15 Nov 95 13:44:00 EST
- In-Reply-To: <m0tFZAH-0004Q6C@example.com>
- References: <m0tFZAH-0004Q6C@example.com>
- Reply-To: tlug@example.com
- Sender: owner-tlug@example.com
Stephen, Thanks for the comparison chart. Something that at one time was true, was that with BSD, that "someone in charge" could sign an NDA, obtain source code considered proprietary by a vendor, write a BSD device driver, and distribute the binaries. Same couldn't be done with Linux. By "taking a look at it", I'm not sure that you could observe "behaviors under load", for example, at one time, ftp.cdrom.com boasted about having xx millions of users ftp'ing off a pc simultaneously with BSD, but I'd be curious at what point Linux breaks down in this area. Ted ***** Ted Matsumura, Adaptec Japan Ltd. ATM Program Manager, InterNetworking Technology (INTO) phone: 03-5276-8433, Fax (03) 5276-9364 email: tmatsumu@example.com http://www.rahul.net/tedm ***** ------------- Original Text >From owner-tlug@example.com, on 11/15/95 1:09 PM: Sam> Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD Oh, no! Not this again.... ;-) Sam> Hello Everyone!! I have been using Linux for about six monts Sam> now and I'm happy with it. The thing is some people aske me Sam> why don't I use bsd but I don't know why I should. They Sam> always tell me that bsd is better but never give me a reason Sam> for it. It's the same right? Does anyone know the different? (1) Linux is more widespread as far as I can tell. (2) Linux has better console support, and is generally somewhat more user-friendly. (3) *BSD has threads. (4) *BSD has (used to have?) better network support. (5) Some *BSDs are binary compatible with some commercial software written for commercial BSDish platforms. (6) BSD is the OS of choice for OS researchers, I'm not sure exactly why. Probably because it is more coherent; the BSD community is much more tightly organized than the Linux community. The Only Thing Linus controls is The Kernel; everything else is handled by whoever feels like it. Thus, Linux has Distributions. By contrast, each *BSD has an Organization or a Person In Charge. In general Linux may have more "stuff", but that's not all that clear. I've ordered the Infomagic BSD CD-ROM, and I will check it out. The last time I tried BSD was when Bill Joy's 386BSD was the only game in town.... -- Stephen J. Turnbull Institute of Socio-Economic Planning Yaseppochi-Gumi University of Tsukuba http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp/ Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, 305 JAPAN turnbull@example.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux vs BSD
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
- References:
- Re: Linux vs BSD
- From: turnbull@example.com (Stephen J. Turnbull)
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: re: Linux vs BSD
- Next by Date: Re: Linux vs BSD
- Prev by thread: Re: Linux vs BSD
- Next by thread: Re: Linux vs BSD
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links