Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List
tlug archive
tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:26:25 +0900
- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <steve@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- References: <PR1P264MB418168C3DB45F90DAE10E007B725A@PR1P264MB4181.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <26760.58139.254293.214473@Stephens-MacBook-Air.local> <CAMyPCTQhGb1RTwcq6vcjV5ecFWxGjUy23pdrnp+MexDhub=PUA@mail.gmail.com>
James Tobin writes: > There is a legal doctrine called equitable estoppel "Equitable estoppel" just means that the court compels performance of the contract (rather than deciding the claim is bullshit or awarding damages). If it's not explicit in the written contract between the recruiter and the employer, I think your recruiter is probably SOL. Also, in situations like this it's rarely the preferred resolution, because it's much too easy for the violator to satisfy the letter of the contract while providing no substantial relief. > I think this is the start of somebody trying to hold employers > accountable to give feedback. IWBNI (I plan to do business that way), but I'm not holding my breath. -- GNU Mailman consultant (installation, migration, customization) Sirius Open Source https://www.siriusopensource.com/ Software systems consulting in Europe, North America, and Japan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- From: James Tobin
- References:
- [tlug] Ghosted?
- From: James Tobin
- [tlug] Ghosted?
- From: Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- From: James Tobin
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] Ghosted?
- Index(es):