Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] White Box: Some Assembly Required ...
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 08:26:25 +0900
- From: Curt Sampson <cjs@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] White Box: Some Assembly Required ...
- References: <20180628032248.2enym5sjqda7j3ct@iambic.cynic.net> <5e7f5a42-3224-80af-3578-0f5b247320d1@gmail.com>
- User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
On 2018-07-02 03:34 +0900 (Mon), CL wrote: > As noted from the beginning, this machine is nothing fancy and > nothing I'd want to bring close to my work PCs.... > > If this works out well, I will use it as the blueprint to build a > larger home-office machine, using top quality server-grade hardware > instead of the "not commercial" level of the current hardware. Ah, the irony. :-) Remember 'RAID' is an acronym for 'Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks,' and the whole point behind it was to move away from using 'top quality server-grade hardware' to avoid failures and instead buy cheap hardware and handle the failures. Google many years ago took this to the logical extreme and filled their data centers with cheap consumer PCs and disks. They failed regularly, but they'd just leave the failed machines there until enough time had passed that even the working one weren't worth keeping any more (because old and slow) and then just replace the whole lot of them in one swipe. This is an approach you should consider. Two cheap machines that sync with each other, especially if you can put them in well-separated buildings, will provide more reliability than one expensive machine simply because there are plenty of data-destruction events that the expensive machines protect against no better than the cheap ones. If you need serious protection against data loss, adding cloud storage to this is not cheap compared to just cheap PCs, but is still far cheaper than any other option for that level of reliability. Look at something like AWS Storage Gateway[1] for one convenient way to handle this. [1]: https://aws.amazon.com/storagegateway/ That said, it sounds as if you may have a relatively small amount of data for this application, in which case something like Dropbox and several single external drives attached to various PCs might do the trick for you and be easiest to use. If you can live with 1 TB of storage, you're looking at about $100/year. Unfortunately Dropbox goes up rapidly from there since you have to move to a business account with a minimum of three users: ¥45,000/year for 2 TB or ¥72,000/year for 'unlimited' storage. The one thing to remember with things like Dropbox (and possibly anything else, for that matter) is that you want an offline drive you update regularly only when you've confirmed that all data are intact, to protect against accidental deletions on your cloud storage followed by sync'ing of those deletions to all your online drives. Cloud services offer an 'undelete' function, of course, but I suspect that there are still situations where undelete may not be able to recover things. cjs -- Curt J. Sampson <cjs@example.com> +81 90 7737 2974 To iterate is human, to recurse divine. - L Peter Deutsch
- References:
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: [tlug] OT: Part-Timers Sought
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] OT: Part-Timers Sought
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] White Box: Some Assembly Required ...
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] White Box: Some Assembly Required ...
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links