Mailing List Archive
tlug.jp Mailing List tlug archive tlug Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:22:48 +0900
- From: Travis Cardwell <travis.cardwell@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- References: <CAFv52OC=rK=dWiAgBwrreKu8EW3uZX6SYhAn6XdqyoVpS4U69w@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.7.0
Hi Josh, On 2014年09月08日 18:32, Josh Glover wrote: > Let's say that some company has a piece of backend software with a > REST interface. Let's also say that some idiotic developer stuck a GPL > notice at the top of some of the source code files, despite the fact > that no GPL code is linked in. This source has never been distributed > in any way, nor have the compiled binaries. The binaries have only > ever run on servers belonging to the hypothetical company for which > the idiotic developer no longer works. > > Can the company legally remove the GPL notice from the source files? The copyright holder(s) of the software can relicense it, given unanimous approval from all copyright holders. All subsequent versions of the software will be under the new license, while prior versions remain under the GPL. Since the software has not been distributed, this should not pose a problem to the company. Disclaimer: While I am reasonably informed on intellectual property law, I am not a lawyer, and this should not be considered actionable advice. Cheers, Travis
- References:
- [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- From: Josh Glover
Home | Main Index | Thread Index
- Prev by Date: Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- Next by Date: Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- Previous by thread: Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- Next by thread: Re: [tlug] GPL question (again!)
- Index(es):
Home Page Mailing List Linux and Japan TLUG Members Links